home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=89TT2099>
- <title>
- Aug. 14, 1989: America Abroad
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1989
- Aug. 14, 1989 The Hostage Agony
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- WORLD, Page 36
- America Abroad
- A Firm No to the Tiger
- </hdr><body>
- <p>By Strobe Talbott
- </p>
- <p> If nothing else, the month-long international conference in
- Paris dramatizes the importance and complexity of events in
- Cambodia. After more than ten years of occupation, Vietnamese
- troops are due to pull out next month. At issue in Paris is
- what happens next -- a new round of civil war or a coalition
- government? And should a coalition include the Khmer Rouge, the
- murderous ultra-Maoists whom the Vietnamese drove into the
- jungle?
- </p>
- <p> The Khmer Rouge's principal backer is China. Prince Norodom
- Sihanouk, who also relies on Chinese patronage, is the overall
- leader of the resistance and likely to head any coalition.
- Although the Khmer Rouge slaughtered 40 of his relatives,
- Sihanouk, like the U.S., has given priority to getting the
- Vietnamese out of Phnom Penh, even if it means letting some
- Khmer Rouge back in. Also like the U.S., he is hoping it will
- be easier to neutralize the Khmer Rouge if some of them are
- running ministries rather than assassinating ministers.
- </p>
- <p> Hun Sen, the Prime Minister of the Vietnamese-sponsored
- regime, is ready to share power with Sihanouk but not with the
- Khmer Rouge -- and for good reason: whether or not they are
- allowed into a coalition, they will certainly try to keep their
- camps and arms caches. Some level of fighting would go on. It
- is a question of whether the Khmer Rouge are granted government
- portfolios and political legitimacy along with their military
- strength. Attending the Paris conference last week, Secretary
- of State James Baker said, "The United States strongly believes
- that the Khmer Rouge should play no role in Cambodia's future."
- That statement was an improvement on one he made in April, when
- he accepted the inclusion of the Khmer Rouge in a coalition as
- "a fact of life." Last week he went on to say that American
- support for a new Cambodian government "will directly and
- inversely depend on the extent of Khmer Rouge participation."
- </p>
- <p> Unfortunately Baker undercut the logic of his new position
- by saying that if Sihanouk insists on maintaining his unholy
- alliance with the Khmer Rouge, the U.S. will go along. Sihanouk,
- in turn, says he will continue to reserve a place for the Khmer
- Rouge in the coalition as long as the Chinese insist on it. So
- on this key issue, Washington is taking its lead from Beijing.
- The aging tyrants responsible for the massacre in Tiananmen
- Square are, with American acquiescence, bestowing respectability
- on the butchers responsible for the killing fields.
- </p>
- <p> It should be the other way around. The Bush Administration
- should be trying harder to get China -- itself in need of some
- respectability these days -- to abandon its most disgraceful
- clients. The U.S. should also withhold aid to Sihanouk until he
- breaks with the Khmer Rouge entirely. Perhaps, deprived of all
- international tolerance, they will suffer defeats, lose their
- ability to recruit troops and fade into history.
- </p>
- <p> Baker implied that Hun Sen and his Vietnamese mentors are
- no better than the Khmer Rouge. The Secretary of State warned
- that the Cambodian people may "be forced to choose between being
- eaten by a tiger or devoured by a crocodile." But this parallel
- does not stand up. Hun Sen has been rebuilding the country that
- the Khmer Rouge destroyed. If it ever comes to a hard choice
- between him and the Khmer Rouge, as indeed it might, the
- Cambodian people would without doubt choose Hun Sen. So should
- the U.S.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-